The following letter to the editor appeared in the November 21 edition of the Guelph Mercury:
Contrary to Lorenz Calcagno’s comments that a number of changes to existing patterns would create more traffic in Guelph’s downtown core, I am convinced that reducing traffic in Guelph’s downtown core is something that we should be striving for. If the City of Guelph wishes to pursue its commitment to environmental stewardship, we should be reviewing traffic patterns in favour of active transportation, such as cycling and walking, rather than attempting to increase motorist traffic flow.
I am unconvinced that declining traffic flow is hurting businesses. Indeed, I am certain the economic health of the downtown area would benefit from reducing motorist traffic and encouraging pedestrian activity.
Calcagno notes that the city core has turned from a thoroughfare district to a destination district and I fail to see the problem. Motorists intending to pass through downtown are unlikely to stop, whereas if we promote the core as a unique destination with a healthy pedestrian-friendly infrastructure, businesses will benefit from a safer downtown with less noise, less exhaust fumes, and a decreased carbon footprint.
The city has already taken steps in the right direction. The pedestrian crossing at St. George’s Square is proof of the city’s commitment to creating a pedestrian-friendly downtown core, and I disagree wholeheartedly with Coun. Ian Findlay’s assertion that we must review that intersection in favour of motorists.
I applaud the efforts of the municipality and encourage city councillors to follow through with their future plans for encouraging active transportation in Guelph.
I hope that there will be a city councillor or other stakeholder to express these concerns at the upcoming meeting of the community development and environmental services committee.
Matthew Little, Guelph